The quarterly board pack
Board packPosture trend, dollar exposure, framework coverage. Rendered from assessment data you already entered — no second data entry.
CISOs, founders, compliance leads, regulated SaaS — each section shows the artifacts and frameworks that matter to your role.
Pick the role that fits — each card jumps to the artifacts, frameworks, and example output for that job.
Risk in dollars, not a color-coded heat map — so a budget meeting ends in a decision. Board pack, audit evidence, the 8-K call, the renewal, each rendered from data you already entered.
Posture trend, dollar exposure, framework coverage. Rendered from assessment data you already entered — no second data entry.
Every audited control mapped to its evidence — findings, intake answers, snapshots, documents. Gaps ranked by remediation effort.
The materiality determination — not the incident — starts the four-business-day clock. The engine drafts the dollar estimate — labeled modeled — and the disclosure narrative.
See the materiality tools →The questionnaire arrives pre-filled from your posture. Premium-loading answers are flagged before you submit.
Overlapping capabilities surface with the dollar delta, labeled modeled. You decide what to cut before renewal.
Each re-upload adds a dated snapshot. The year-over-year chart is history, not memory.
No CISO yet, a questionnaire on the table. Assess produces the document in one session.
A 5,000-person prospect sends a SIG Lite questionnaire and asks for your SOC 2 report. You have neither. Vendor-risk teams send these regardless of your headcount.
Run Assess in one session for a scored posture assessment and a compliance-only report to answer it with. Pre-filled answers, like the sample here, come from the questionnaire auto-answerer on Program — same day, deal alive.
A director asks about your cyber risk profile. Every answer you have sounds improvised.
Walk in with the PDF: posture score, top risks, a dollar-labeled do-nothing scenario, a 90-day roadmap.
A company in your category gets breached. Investors ask: are we exposed to that?
The assessment names the techniques active in your sector and the controls in your stack that answer them. A specific answer, not arm-waving.
Renewal lands with twelve pages of technical questions you can’t answer alone.
Your assessment gives you the posture to answer from, truthfully. On Operate and up, the insurance broker pack flags the premium-loading questions first.
They start with “tell me about your posture.” You have nothing written down.
Hand them the assessment on day one. They start fixing instead of spending a month on discovery.
$499/mo or $4,800/yr — annual saves $1,188.
Monthly, cancel anytime.
Most founders start on Assess and upgrade when the first security hire lands. Upgrades prorate.
All 24 frameworks scored at once — each control labeled with where its score came from.
We authored the mapping from the product to the framework’s controls. It is the strongest score we give, and it is still modeled: an auditor will ask for the config, and when you upload it, any finding against that control cites the setting it comes from.
Scored through the crosswalk table, capped at 75% per control. A signal for direction, weaker than a direct mapping.
Part direct mapping, part crosswalk. Strongest where direct, indicative where derived, and every contribution is shown.
When a framework has no authored mappings at all (all-derived), we show no framework number — it reads not directly scored rather than a manufactured score. When direct evidence exists but is thin, the number is capped at 70/100 (ceiling) with a footnote. A derived score never masquerades as a direct audit.
The engine scores 24 frameworks from around the world: 13 from direct product mappings, and 11 through the crosswalk while their direct mappings are built. Provenance is always visible.
Direct per-product mappings, our strongest modeled score. CMMC Level 2 is scored through the crosswalk for now.
Scored via direct control mappings, calibrated for European regulatory specifics. Deployment playbooks for NIS2 / DORA are deferred — and the assessment says so.
Direct mappings for NCA ECC and SAMA; the rest are scored through the crosswalk for now. Provenance always visible.
Derived from anchor frameworks, ceiling-capped, labeled.
Fintech & payments teams land here. PCI DSS, SOC 2, plus your regional banking framework — scored together, in one pass.
Your buyer's vendor-risk team treats you like any third party touching customer data — whatever your headcount.
The questionnaire arrives and their review runs 6–12 weeks. CyberTwin scores SOC 2 and ISO 27001 against your real configurations in one session — so you answer with artifacts, not promises.
A poisoned dependency reaches production before any review catches it. Days later it touches customer data.
Laptops carry production-adjacent credentials. One leaked secret in a public commit is immediate access.
A departing admin exports customer data through product paths — CSV, tokens, BI. No perimeter alert fires.
SOC 2 and ISO 27001 playbooks are both authored and current — each scored on its own direct mappings, with provenance labels showing direct versus derived. NIS2 and DORA are scored via direct control mappings too; what's deferred is their deployment playbooks — and the assessment says so explicitly.
Healthtech teams land here too. HIPAA, ISO 27001, PHI handling — the same review, scored against your regulators.