Three ways in. One engine.
The same engine runs underneath all three — the door you pick just changes what you hand it. Design a stack from a blank page, score the one you already run, or upload a real config export and let it read the bytes.
For new programs, M&A integrations, or "let's start over" moments. The engine designs a security stack from your industry, size, regulatory load, and budget — three priced architectures (Lean / Balanced / Advanced) with real products, real prices, and the reference architectures teams like you actually deploy.
A short profile: industry, headcount, regions, frameworks in scope, current stack, budget, and concerns — you describe it. Documents you upload are read to ask you follow-up questions and to flag where they contradict your answers; they don’t fill in the profile for you.
- Three priced architectures with real product recommendations from a catalog of 99 products
- An architecture diagram of the Balanced stack — its zones, the deployment order, and how the products connect
- A deployment plan: every product in order, with a written setup guide where one exists, filled in with your details — a draft your team reviews and applies
- Compliance coverage scored across 24 frameworks, a Do-Nothing dollar scenario, and a sequenced upgrade roadmap with cost and lead time
- Or start from requirements: a target architecture for AWS, Azure, on-premises or hybrid, re-run through the attack-path engine, with a bill of materials against your budget and a draft FortiGate config — all modeled
- A board-ready PDF behind every number
The Balanced stack for a 200-person SaaS / Software company, as a system
Modeled from a sample profile, never a scan. Empty zones are gaps the tier leaves open — named, not hidden.
EXAMPLE · 200-person SaaS / Software sample profile → the engine's Balanced answer: 13 products at $185,235/yr list (dated 2026-09-25), the architecture above, and a 29-person-week deployment order. Modeled from the sample, never a scan.
For teams who already deployed but want a second opinion. The engine scores your current posture, surfaces the gaps, recommends optimizations to the tools you already own before you buy anything new, and produces a roadmap of what to swap, augment, or consolidate.
What you run today — the products, vendors, and configuration you describe in intake. Documents you upload, draw.io diagrams included, are read to ask follow-up questions and flag contradictions with your answers; a diagram is not yet turned into zones and connections. Modeled reachability is labeled modeled; nothing is invented.
- Posture scored against 24 frameworks, with explicit / derived provenance per control
- An architecture review of the configs you upload — trust zones, the path from a foothold to your crown jewels across the 14 supported vendor families, the fix order, and a proposed target design (modeled)
- Redundant-tool and coverage-gap findings with consolidation savings, and an upgrade roadmap — what to add, replace or switch on, with cost and lead time
- A prioritized risk register with named threat-actor patterns, and the board-ready report
EXAMPLE · 450-person SaaS, San Francisco. Existing CrowdStrike Falcon + Splunk + Okta → 4 redundant tools, 2 critical data-loss-prevention gaps, annual consolidation savings of $70k–$110k (range · MODELED), SOC 2 score 71→89 with three configuration changes.
Upload a real configuration export and the engine parses the actual bytes against vendor-specific best practices — 1,913 checks across 37 supported vendors. Every finding is read from your real file. For FortiGate, PAN-OS and OPNsense configs, findings are labeled proven: the engine re-parses the file, so each of those findings can be re-checked. For every other vendor, findings are labeled observed — read from your file, without a re-checkable proof until that vendor's parser lands. Anything inferred is labeled modeled. The kind of review a consultant takes weeks to deliver — re-run it yourself any time a config changes.
A configuration export from any of the 37 supported vendors — firewall, WAF, EDR, cloud, identity, SIEM, email, backup, DLP. Secrets are redacted across 8 secret classes before storage; nothing is stored in the clear. No live scan, no agent, no connected integration.
- Configuration-wide checks for overly permissive any-any grants, risky settings and missing protections, read from your file. Not yet: the rule-by-rule pass (shadowed and redundant rules, one row per policy) — it is being switched on and is not part of today's review
- Assess and Operate audit one vendor's export per review; on Program every vendor is covered and findings stitch cross-vendor to your crown jewels
- Findings with real evidence excerpts from your file (read from the artifact, not asserted)
- A written fix for every finding, plus the exact replacement config wherever the engine generates one — corrected CLI for most FortiGate findings, snippets for many Palo Alto, Cisco ASA, Microsoft and CrowdStrike checks
- The attack path each gap opens, and the compliance controls it maps to
- A posture score and a tamper-evident record you can re-check offline
Intrusion-prevention profile not assigned to the default policy.
EXAMPLE · FortiGate config upload → 36 findings (6 critical, 11 high), posture 0/100. Top finding: intrusion-prevention profile not assigned to the default policy. Replacement snippet generated. SOC 2 CC6.6 + ISO 27001 A.13.1.1 flagged.
PER-VENDOR CHECK DEPTH · 37 VENDORS →
Depth varies by vendor, and we publish it — the live check count per vendor, next quarter's target, and the last baseline review, so you can size up before you buy. AWS Config / Security Hub is the reference plugin at 94 checks today.
| Vendor | Category | Checks today | Target Q1 2027 | Last review | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AWS Config / Security Hub | cloud | 94 | 25 | 2026-04-01 | Reference depth |
| Azure Policy + Defender for Cloud | cloud | 87 | 25 | 2026-04-01 | Reference depth |
| GCP Security Command Center | cloud | 84 | 25 | 2026-04-01 | Reference depth |
| CrowdStrike Falcon | endpoint | 73 | 25 | 2026-04-01 | Reference depth |
| Jamf Pro | endpoint | 71 | 25 | 2026-04-01 | Reference depth |
| Auth0 | identity | 70 | 25 | 2026-04-01 | Reference depth |
| Microsoft Intune | endpoint | 69 | 25 | 2026-04-01 | Reference depth |
| Sophos XGS | network | 60 | 25 | 2026-04-01 | Reference depth |
| Fortinet FortiGate | network | 59 | 36 | 2026-04-12 | Reference depth |
| Mimecast | 57 | 25 | 2026-04-01 | Reference depth | |
| Elastic Security | siem | 55 | 25 | 2026-04-01 | Reference depth |
| Okta | identity | 53 | 25 | 2026-04-01 | Reference depth |
| Google Workspace | identity | 53 | 25 | 2026-04-01 | Reference depth |
| Cisco Meraki | network | 52 | 25 | 2026-04-01 | Reference depth |
| AWS IAM | identity | 52 | 26 | 2026-04-22 | Reference depth |
| Microsoft Defender for Office 365 | 52 | 22 | 2026-04-18 | Reference depth | |
| WatchGuard Firebox | network | 51 | 25 | 2026-04-01 | Reference depth |
| Abnormal Security | 51 | 25 | 2026-04-01 | Reference depth | |
| Veeam Backup & Replication | backup | 51 | 25 | 2026-04-01 | Reference depth |
| Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS | network | 50 | 28 | 2026-04-15 | Reference depth |
| JumpCloud | identity | 48 | 25 | 2026-04-01 | Reference depth |
| Proofpoint | 46 | 25 | 2026-04-01 | Reference depth | |
| pfSense | network | 45 | 25 | 2026-04-01 | Reference depth |
| Check Point GAIA / R81+ | network | 45 | 25 | 2026-04-01 | Reference depth |
| SentinelOne | endpoint | 45 | 25 | 2026-04-01 | Reference depth |
| Juniper SRX | network | 44 | 25 | 2026-04-01 | Reference depth |
| Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | endpoint | 44 | 25 | 2026-04-01 | Reference depth |
| Microsoft Purview DLP | dlp | 44 | 25 | 2026-04-01 | Reference depth |
| Cisco ASA / Firepower | network | 42 | 25 | 2026-04-01 | Reference depth |
| Microsoft Sentinel | siem | 42 | 22 | 2026-04-18 | Reference depth |
| Cloudflare WAF | waf | 40 | 25 | 2026-04-01 | Reference depth |
| Microsoft Entra ID Conditional Access | identity | 35 | 24 | 2026-04-08 | Reference depth |
| Splunk Enterprise Security | siem | 35 | 25 | 2026-04-01 | Reference depth |
| Rubrik | backup | 34 | 25 | 2026-04-01 | Reference depth |
| AWS WAF | waf | 34 | 25 | 2026-04-01 | Reference depth |
| OPNsense | network | 27 | 25 | 2026-04-01 | Production |
| GitHub Advanced Security | cloud | 19 | 25 | 2026-04-01 | Baseline |
Don't see your vendor at the depth you need? Email feedback@cybertwin.io.
Every plan includes Design and Review: the architecture review, new designs, the deployment plan and the upgrade roadmap. Configuration Reviews: Assess 1 a year · Operate 3 · Program unlimited.